I remember as a kid asking how a sunset worked. My teacher told me that it had to do with light refracting and air pollution. I didn't get the light part and I only understood pollution as the invisible force that made it harder for me to breathe. However, I appreciated sunsets more with the belief in redemption. In my childlike mind, I thought that God was taking the pollution and painting something beautiful, using nothing more than the rays of the sun.
Micah mixes God and science and all of that together when he enters the house with a handful of snail shells. "Look, the spiral gets bigger and bigger the further out you go," he says,
I nod my head.
"And it's the same shape as the star swirl," he says, pointing to the astronomy book on the book shelf. "I think God likes that pattern."
He's silent for a moment and then said, "It's like anger. It starts out right here and ends right here," he says pointing to the spiral on the snail shell.
He's almost giddy about the spirals and the patterns and the inherent systems thinking that occurs when learning doesn't exist in silos. Micah isn't focussed on the future or finding a great career or the practicality of what he's saying. Sometimes it is practical. In this very same evening, Micah wants to learn to write in order to leave a note next to the flowers he has picked for his mother. But even when it's practical, it's not an investment. It's not a commodity.
Micah is right. The journey is enough. There is a joy in hearing classical music and finally "getting" the chord progressions, watching Shakespeare performed live, understanding the geekier side of football formations or appreciating art in a museum.
When asked why we learn, I am quick to talk about meaning and purpose and thinking well about life. Sometimes I find myself justifying a subject for economic reasons (they'll need this for a job). I'm starting to wonder, though, if there is a balance to the notion of purpose-driven learning. I get it. Wisdom is often part of a hard or painful process. Sometimes what is valuable to learn isn't fun.
And yet . . .
Often it is. There is a joy in learning that we miss when we define education in practical terminology. I recently read blog posts by students describing how they would "hack" school. Many wrote about the irrelevance of physics, biology, certain aspects of math and almost all of history. However, I wonder if the high school students were missing something in defining relevance only through a utilitarian lens. Learning isn't a product.
If Shakespeare is a irrelevant, it's because you haven't truly experienced Shakespeare. If the Mayans bore you, chances are you haven't had a chance to explore the archeology behind our knowledge or think about the deeper social structures of Mayan society. If science sucks, it's probably because it's been presented as a series of formulas and steps to walk through. There's beauty there if kids have a chance to observe it.
It has me thinking that as much as I advocate for critical thinking, I wonder if I should speak out a little more about the joy of learning.

"I think God likes that pattern" might be the best bridge between science and faith right there.
ReplyDeleteThis is going to be the focus of my grad class this week... the joy of learning. Thanks for the inspiration. Hope you are enjoying a lovely Sunday.
ReplyDeleteThis is the biggest issue in the discourse over education in this day and age. For those who can't recall (or didn't experience?) the joy of learning in a classroom, it seems obvious that education is about utility in a narrow vocational sense (I prefer vocational over economic because the meaning in economic theory is actually a lot wider than just money and does encompass the joy aspect). Their framing of the narrative of education tends to omit the joy of learning, and with it the idea of learning as an inherent good without need of a monetary justification. Often lip service is given to the idea of 'learning to learn', but to me the ability to learn is a product of the joy of learning: if you have experienced the joy of learning then you will be more open to learning new things, and this openness is the key to learning and more important than any supposed 'technique' that one can learn (there are of course useful techniques, but if you aren't open to learning then they are the equivalent of students' cram techniques for exams which include forgetting afterwards).
ReplyDeleteHaving just read over what I wrote above, I have to say that I'm struck by the contradictions in a lot of the discourse over training in enterprises which just occurred to me. The desire is for staff who are 'innovative' thinkers and have the ability to learn new things (and therefore must have an openness to new ideas and making connections) and at the same time training should be deliverable as fixed size packages with preset results which can be ticked off one-by-one (a closed 'fill the bucket' view of learning).
The comparison to anger is pretty deep - looks like a great thinker developing there.
Easily, the post is actually the greatest on this deserving topic. I agree with your conclusions and will thirstily look forward to your coming updates.
ReplyDeleteCoursework Help | GCSE Coursework | Science Coursework | Statistics Coursework | Sociology Coursework | UK Coursework Writing | Research Paper Writing