Nobody seemed to ask about critical thinking, but that was at the forefront of my mind. In many classes, no one picked apart ideas. Students weren't creating anything. There was no wrestling with ideas.
It wasn't the vast majority, but it was enough to make me sick to my stomach. Some would suggest that we blame teachers. On some level, I do. But I don't blame them for a lack of skill so much as a lack of courage. They weren't willing to risk low scores.
See, you can't push differentiation and then assess in one-size-fits-all. You can't push for critical thinking and then push tests that are shallow and mindless. You can't push for cooperative learning and then set up assessment systems where students work in isolation. If you want to know why teachers aren't using "best practices," it's because they are assessed through worst practices.
As long as teachers are judged by the test, the vast majority will teach to the test. As long assessment remains synonymous with mindless, kill-and-drill, multiple choice tests, the instructional practices will not change.
Bottom line: before you can change instruction, you have to change assessment. And before you can change assessment, you have to find better ways to define what quality learning looks like and what quality teaching means.
All of this requires a missing element: trust.
Until politicians and bureaucrats learn to trust teachers and trust students, instruction will remain isolated, repetitious, irrelevant and shallow.
"If you want to know why teachers aren't using "best practices," it's because they are assessed through worst practices."
ReplyDeleteF--ing genius, my friend.
Thanks.
DeleteRight on. This just about sums it all up. I wonder when we will truly be lucky enough to have someone in the White House who will finally recognize what we need as a profession. More importantly, what our students need and deserve.
DeleteThanks for the post,
Amen.
ReplyDeleteBut will the bureaucrats give teachers the trust?
Hell no.
Yeah, I'm doubtful as well.
DeleteJohn, I agree that there are many teachers out there that don't want to take risks, because there is too much riding on the tests. It takes real courage to practice an educational philosophy that values creativity, innovation, and critical thinking skills. Let alone share those ideas with your peers that are being evaluated with the same 'effectiveness' rubric.
ReplyDeleteMy hopes, dreams, and those of my family depend on me being successful in my job. Unfortunately a great deal of that success depends on the growth of my students on state tests. That type instruction does not excite me, but there are ways to help kids achieve whatever it is that the state board feels is important and still be relevant to their long term learning. Mastery of the standards is not the ending goal of my job. Working with kids that love to learn, enjoy pursuing their academic interests, cooperate, collaborate, and maximize their potential is my purpose. I hope that none of my students ever characterize what we do in our classroom as shallow and irrelevant. If they all 'passed' the test, but thought of our time together in those terms, then I really would have failed.
I have this lyric from Led Zeppelin in my room "I had a dream. Crazy dream. Anything I wanted to know, any place I needed to go" - Welcome to Room 216. The song may remain the same for some, but there are many of us out here trying be the change we want to see.
I think you have a really healthy, balanced way of seeing it. I just fear that many teachers don't. Many teachers are feeling the pressure and are getting scared.
DeleteI wanted to say "Amen" at the end of this. You've really hit the nail on the head.
ReplyDeleteEvery time I take a risk with an instructional strategy and it takes longer than expected or students need a lot of coaching to master it or we just don't get where I hoped we would with it I find myself moving back towards lecture next time because I cannot get the ticking clock out of my head. It's the ticking clock of "you need to teach all 80 pages of the world history standards in time to start reviewing for the test by spring break".
I used to primarily teach collaborative inclusion history classes and the whole idea of differentiated teaching to a completely un-differentiated test really annoyed me.
That ticking clock can be brutal. I know what you mean.
Delete